
A Brief Explanation of "Community Property"

There are at least two types of state schemes for the division of
marital property at the time of divorce or death. One of these types is
called "equitable distribution", by which the Court is supposed to look
at
the whole picture of the family's assets, debts, and resources, and
determine what the most equitable division of each, or the total taken
as a whole, would be.
Another type of distribution scheme is that of "community property",
such as you have in California. In a community property state,
generally speaking each party (husband and wife) at the time of divorce
is entitled to end up with exactly half of the value of the total value
of the family assets and resources, minus any family debt and other
adjustments (such as exempting property which either the husband or wife
owned prior to the marriage).
While this may sound very simple on first blush, consider issues such as
"how do you value stock options, and are they the fruit of the marriage
(the "community") or of the person earning the options?", and "what
happens if one spouse has a business prior to the marriage, and during
the marriage the other spouse works at the business, increasing its
value?" While there are many (and often competing) formulas for working
out the right answers to these questions, they serve to demonstrate just how
complicated community property issues can be.
Many legal commentators think that the community property system is more
fair, as it attempts to force an equal division of the family property,
or at least of the value of the property. Others think that giving the
Court more discretion to award property or other assets unevenly, as
circumstances may suggest appropriate, is more fair.